MASTER POST FOR REVIEWS AND FEEDBACK
Sep. 3rd, 2012 09:10 am![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
alladinsane.livejournal.com posting in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
dragoncon_lj_archivePost Reviews and or Feedback on D*C here.
alladinsane.livejournal.com posting in dragoncon_lj_archivealladinsane.livejournal.com posting in dragoncon_lj_archive
Page Summary
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2012-09-05 04:54 pm (UTC)They get shown a portfolio of work from each artist that submits (150-200 people this year). They look at each portfolio unnamed and give each portfolio a 1 to 10 grade with general comments. Anyone making less than a 2 was automatically cut. They then take the score and put it through an equation with some other variables that I forget and have a final score.
They did not take into account subject material, but look at quality of the technical work and if the artist had a single vision for their work. One complaint was that many people's portfolio's seemed like it was a portfolio for 2-3 people because each piece would be so different and lacked consistency.