Marriot Question: Fee per Room Occupant
Aug. 24th, 2009 01:27 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Does anyone have any general information on what the Marriott might additionally charge for occupants numbering over 4? Is there a general per person fee or does that sort of stuff just get lumped in with other charges?
no subject
Date: 2009-08-24 09:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-24 09:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-24 09:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-24 09:54 pm (UTC)I've been told directly by a Marriott hotel manager that they will be cracking down on room overcrowding and checking rooms to see if they are over maximum occupancy this year.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-24 10:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-24 10:19 pm (UTC)Fun side note: in Spain, the word for handcuffs is "las esposas".
no subject
Date: 2009-08-24 10:22 pm (UTC)I don't even do over-crowding of rooms (I like to be able to walk to the bathroom at night without tripping over my friends), but I just don't see room occupancy being enforced. It's too common place in cons by way too many people, and then there's the overall party/getting together spirit of the thing that causes people to congregate in rooms en masse. There's not enough security for that.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-24 10:52 pm (UTC)As I may've said elsewhere, other people's honor and sense of ethics (or lack thereof) are their business, not mine. So long as they're not claiming to be honorable people while they use the "everybody ELSE is doing it, therefore it should be disqualified as 'wrong' when I do it too!" justification -- and so long as no one is being harmed by it -- I would have to put effort into caring any less.
(I do count extra work and unpaid overtime and loss of employment due to unfair use as all shoplifting-level harm, of course, but anybody who's civil about it won't cause those problems anyhow.)
And, hey, if you're right, no trouble for anybody; while if I'm right, after the con's over we'll have a fun time here on the community reminding some posters of Dragon*Con Convention Policies (http://www.dragoncon.org/policies.php) 7 and (maybe) 12. Possibly with illustrations!
no subject
Date: 2009-08-24 10:59 pm (UTC)I'm....not quite sure where you're going in your point(s?) but I figure we've each said all of what we needed to on the subject. ;)
Whoops!
Date: 2009-08-24 11:10 pm (UTC)Two hotel security types show up. One keeps everybody's attention. The second quietly takes non-flash photos with one of those cameras designed to look like a pen. They don't have to be great photos, just passable enough to roughly identify persons. After the first conversation, and they leave your room, they go look at the photos in the security office and note which faces belonged in the room.
Next time they make a surprise visit, usually prompted by having observed a crapload of people entering Room #### while hotel staff were doing something else on a nearby floor, hotel security takes a quick look at those photos again before walking up to the door in question. The presence of more than #Official_Capacity bodies again is taken as a deliberate violation, and the hotel enacts its reserved right to end the reservation instantly. Easy peasy.
Bonus points are awarded if the fire marshal is the one who sent 'em up for the second visit!
Re: Whoops!
Date: 2009-08-24 11:30 pm (UTC)Re: Whoops!
Date: 2009-08-25 12:28 am (UTC)Re: Whoops!
Date: 2009-08-25 01:14 am (UTC)If it were the room I'm staying in, we'd point at Dearly Beloved for answer to the first question, and he'd point at me and
I hope they don't. I think the two times we're likely to have several people over are Thursday night, for Awesome Henna Commission appointment, and Sunday night, for watching the Masquerade while eating supper. Henna won't run super-late, but the Masquerade always does.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-24 10:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-24 10:08 pm (UTC)It is a violation of fire safety law, and of the agreement you sign when you rent a hotel room, to have more occupants than the maximum occupancy listed on the door. In the Marriott rooms with a single king bed, that's four; it's generally equal to the number of room keys they're willing to issue you.
The Lawful Good thing to do would be to rent a number of rooms with occupancies that add up to the total group staying together. If you "get caught", the hotel may ask you to rent an additional room for those additional people. Or get rid of the additional people. Or get out entirely.
That said, I'm at best Neutral Good, if I can be said to have an honor alignment at all; I don't think poorly of my friend who puts six adult humans in a room meant for four, and he doesn't pay an additional cost. He's also very good about making sure they tip Housekeeping well if they use Housekeeping at all, and he leaves the room pretty clean, with everything off the bed and out of the way so the maid can do her job. Consider the price of additional occupants to be "making damn sure we give the hotel staff no reason to Officially Take Note of our rules violation, or to regret having turned a blind eye in our direction."
This is not legal advice, do not try this unless you're a good bullshitter!
Date: 2009-08-24 10:23 pm (UTC)The hotel can only bill you for what they can PROVE took place. You can have 20 people in your room (as scary as that maybe), but unless there's 20 people there, SLEEPING, when housekeeping shows up, then there's no proof.
I also tend to find that most people don't sleep at the same time as others. So there could be 10 people in there at 6am, and 5 at Noon, and maybe another 5 at 10pm.
The general rule though is that you can only get room keys for the people you admit to having in your room. (There's also usually max set for each type of room.)
Re: This is not legal advice, do not try this unless you're a good bullshitter!
Date: 2009-08-25 01:14 am (UTC)But people run on different schedules at Con, so if you have 3 people who are diurnal and 3 nocturnal, although you have more than 4 people technically staying in the room, no more than 4 will probably be there at once.
Re: This is not legal advice, do not try this unless you're a good bullshitter!
Date: 2009-08-25 02:32 am (UTC)As far as "losing keys", that doesn't really work as most hotels can kick a lost key 'out of the system' if it's reported as lost. This is done for safety purposes as front desk occasionally writes the room number on keys.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-24 11:50 pm (UTC)And since someone earlier mentioned outside food/drink, I wanted to ask:
What is the best covert way to get lots of beer into a hotel room? One of my roomies works for AB in St Louis, and he's bringing a lot of beer cases with him. Last year one of the bellhops told us we could just bring it in, so he helped us load it on a cart. Then we get stopped by management and it gets held from us until check out. This year we'd like to have it with us in the room. We were thinking just taking the cans/bottles and wrapping them up in a couple of suitcases. Is that the best way or might there be another? :)
no subject
Date: 2009-08-24 11:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-25 12:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-25 12:31 am (UTC)Basically they can't say anything if you keep it in your room.
This is just a suggestion ^_~
Date: 2009-08-25 02:38 am (UTC)The highest point of getting caught is within eye sight of the front desk. Your best bet is to make a diversion (shouldn't be hard at D*C), cover the questionable materials, and walk with a purpose. Anyone in a suit or uniform should be intercepted by a member of your party with a lot of 'concerns' about their stay. (Please note that this should be done only after check-in when all party members have secured keys.)
Honestly the best time to attempt this is on Friday when front desk is SLAMMED and there's virtually no one to see/stop you amidst the throng of con-goers.
My family has smuggled pets and numerable other items into rooms in the past--including people, using this method.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-25 11:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-25 01:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-25 01:52 am (UTC)Or do you bring a drink or a snack into your from outside the hotel? The hotel's policies mean you're violating the rules in that way.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-25 02:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-25 02:05 am (UTC)The "outside food and drink" rules are in place for money making reasons. Worst Case Scenario: the Marriott loses a few bucks on a sandwich. You don't starve and in all actuality, the guy making the sandwiches isn't going to lose his job.
The # of guest per room are there for real safety reasons. Worst Case Scenario: People die in a fire/tornado/natural disaster/weird accident because there were too many people in a hotel room or on a particular floor.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-25 02:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-25 12:22 pm (UTC)That said, if you are going to violate rules, then don't throw it in hotel staff's faces. If you're going to haul cases of beer in, at least giftwrap them and say they're a present for your friends or something, and make sure your roomates clean up after themselves so the housekeeping staff doesn't have a huge mess at the end of things. People can be good at ignoring the little things...Just make sure none of them become major things, and it's all good.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-25 06:29 pm (UTC)And since we've decided to take MARTA, we'll definitely have to be packing the beer in extra suitcases!
Thank you.
Date: 2009-08-25 08:03 pm (UTC)In fact, the concierge has even helped me make a pizza order, and given me directions to a nearby drugstore. The Marriott used to have minirefrigerators in every room, and had no objection to cleaning out any resident minibars so we could use that space for our own supplies; last year, they apologized because they'd run out of minifridges before we arrived, and since we didn't need refrigeration for baby food or medications, it would've been obnoxious to ask 'em to cancel one of the other room's hold on a minifridge.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-25 03:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-25 12:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-25 08:09 pm (UTC)...
... did you ever notice, there's no feminine equivalent for "frood"? That's not right!
no subject
Date: 2009-08-26 04:40 am (UTC)