Walk of Fame questions/comments
Sep. 2nd, 2008 09:26 am![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
I had a great time at DC overall, i hit a few snags driving there but once I finally got there and settled in, things were good
I was just waondering what was up with the walk of fame this year? Is it me or did the celebs seem to be chraging a lot more? Also I think it was JCB's people that were charging $20.00 just to take a picture with them and $30.00 for the auto, is it me or does that seem excessive? When I was in there they had the ;east amount of people waiting to see them. Also I know before some did not pose for photos, but you could at least take pics, I saw many with no camera signs areound and they had someone watching to make sure you did not even take your camera out. What was that about? The BG guys were all great and were taking pictures with people, but many others would not. Just wondering what others think.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-07 09:09 pm (UTC)I know that most of the celebs I talk to about the ninja-sniper-photo-takers, they would prefer not to have those 'long' distance shots taken. First of all, because it's not fair to those who come up and pay for an autograph or a picture. Secondly because these people make their living from their image and when you snipe photos from a distance, they are unable to compose themselves for the pic. Most distance photos are not flattering for that very reason and if you and I hate having unflattering photos floating about on the 'net, just imagine how that doubles for them. And, my gosh, if you really like them enough to take their picture, why not come up and say hi anyway?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 12:17 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-07 09:10 pm (UTC)I think a lot of the people had "no photo" signs because they have contracts with Froggy, the guy who does the professional photos at the con. I don't know Froggy personally, and for all I know, he might be a super nice guy. Unfortunately, though, my experiences with con guests have really taken a turn for the worse since he came onto the circuit. I loved the old days of paying for the autographed photo, getting to chat for a few seconds, and then getting a photo of me with the guest, taken with my own camera. Nowadays that's getting less and less common, and it kind of makes me sad. I would love to have photos of myself with the guest at their table, and I'd even be willing to pay an additional five bucks for it. I don't want to have to pay an additional $30-75 to have a Sears Family Portrait made of me and the celeb, though.
I think since the pro photos have become commonplace, the costs of everything guest-related have increased. Many of the same guests I paid $20 for an autographed picture and a photo with my camera a couple of years ago now are charging $25-30 for just an autograph, with their only photo option being the professional one. It makes me feel less in touch with the guests and more like it's a big money machine.
That said, there are still super awesome experiences to be had. Jerry Doyle took extra time to talk with me, was extremely nice, and even offered to get a photo with me using my camera (even though he was on Froggy's list at $30 per photo). So it's not a blanket situation that covers all the guests, but it's definitely more prevalent every year.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-07 10:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:ghost hunters
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-07 09:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-07 09:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-07 09:35 pm (UTC)Going back a decade I can remember the conventions when you could get people to sign stuff for *GASP* FREE!
I know, hard to believe, right? I remember if you had your own memorabilia the star would sign for free (or something relatively cheap) and you could buy one os several photos from the star if you wanted an autographed picture. I recall somewhere I have a picture of Paul Darrow from Blake's 7 and I know it only cost me a whopping $15 AND I got a pic with him. The whole argument of 'these people make their money off their appearance' is rubbish because I don't see a single Paparazzi photographer being told 'you have to pay $30 per photo plz'. so who's getting screwed? The fans apparently.
Yes I know a lot of celebs donate to charities and whatnot, and I applaud that, but I think it robs a fair bit of goodwill from your fans/fandom in general if all we see is them with their hands out for MORE money.
Thus, I have never, nor will I ever, pay the ridiculous fees involved to get a memento from a celeb these days. I will say hello, thank them for their work, and move on... Until they day they start charging for THAT too... :P
Celeb autographs
Date: 2008-09-08 12:59 pm (UTC)Re: Celeb autographs
From:Re: Celeb autographs
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-07 09:45 pm (UTC)Look at someone like Michael Dorn, who at the bare minimum is signing 6-10 an hour, and if he has a line he can do way more. Take that times $30.00. Good grief.
I wonder where the inflation will stop. I guess it'll be when people stop lining up to pay them.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-07 09:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-07 09:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-07 09:55 pm (UTC)i didn't even bother with the Walk of Fame this year for those reasons.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-07 10:36 pm (UTC)Many actors don't actually pocket the autograph money, and it's donated... Many, not all.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 01:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-07 11:11 pm (UTC)I was expecting to pay $20 per autograph like D*C 2006 and I ended up getting fewer autographs because of the $5 increase per actor. I had only budgeted $100 for autographs and I stuck to my budget. If it's $35 or more per autograph next year I can't imagine getting any.
And the professional photos are a joke, if you ask me. The backgrounds suck and I hate that the photos are from so far away as I prefer close up shots of faces. One time I paid $40 for a photo with Zachary Quinto and neither Zach or I look good in the photo (yes, an actual picture of a celeb looking bad!) and I thought what a waste of my money for one try at a picture while being rushed through the line. No thanks.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-09 12:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-07 11:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-07 11:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-07 11:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-07 11:50 pm (UTC)The other guys all took pics at their tables too even from people that did not get an auto and they were all signed up for photo ops.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-07 11:43 pm (UTC)retarded lines and WAY TOO MUCH $$$$
back to drinking at Con.....
hey... at least it smelled better than the Hilton in there!
no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 12:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 12:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 12:30 am (UTC)Other than that the only other thing I have is a pic of me with Gareth David Lloyd when I happened to catch him in front of the Starbuck's in the Marriott.
I'm one of the stealth photogs. in the walk of fame. My feeling is, if I just want to take a picture why should I pay for it? I'm not going to pay for an auto., I'm not going to pay Froggy to take my pic with them, and if they're going to charge me a ridiculous amount to take a pic with my own camera I'm not going to do that either. I just want a memory, something to look at after its over, so why not charge less (say $10) and I would be more likely to pay to take a pic with them, with my own camera. That's my feeling on that anyway.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 12:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 12:44 am (UTC)pics walk of fame
Date: 2008-09-08 04:56 pm (UTC)and acbar ,how goes it? talked to you at the elevators at days inn last week before we all left
Re: pics walk of fame
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 12:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 01:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 04:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 02:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 02:38 am (UTC)i had originally submitted this post on 9-2-2008 and they just approved and posted it today,but i guess it keeps the orignal date and time if that is what you meant
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 03:03 am (UTC)As for Froggy, I know some people don't like it, but I think they did great for the volume of people they have to deal with during the weekend. No complaints about the quality or the way my pictures turned out either.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 06:13 am (UTC)I mean yeah I can understand having to pay for professional pictures but just pictures that you take with your own camera that you will have to pay for to get developed and copies and whatnot I just don't see the point in having to pay for that...by the time it is all over with you end up spending over 100 dollars on a meeting with an actor (especially if you met multiple actors and actresses) I mean I have been going since 2003 and I remember paying for autographs yes but pictures no.
but I can say that I did enjoy meeting Mr. Astin and Mr. Llewellyn even if I didn't get to get a picture with them I still at least have an autograph and I will remember our meetings.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 01:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 01:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 04:21 pm (UTC)JCB
Date: 2008-09-08 07:36 pm (UTC)I wish
From:Re: I wish
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 05:58 pm (UTC)I wonder who was charging the most?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 07:02 pm (UTC)amen
From:Re: amen
From: