Date: 2013-07-13 12:23 pm (UTC)
I agree that we probably don't have to worry about security at D*C making blameless people feel uncomfortable. My point is that any well intentioned movement can go too far. As others have pointed out, a policy is only as good as the quality of the enforcement. If the people charged with enforcing it are mature, fair and even handed, everything will be fine. But all it would take to have it go to far would be for a few Barney Fife or Paul Blart types to be involved. I'm sure folks like that wouldn't last long in a security postion at D*C, but they could be around long enough to cause a different kind of problem. In my personal experience, D*C security does a great job in a difficult situation. I have nothing but praise for them. But adding significant extra security to strongly enforce anti-harassment is bound to bring in a few untested or over zealous individuals who'll take a while to weed out. The problem needs to be addressed, but the solution has to be carefully considered and implemented. Let's not have another witch hunt.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

dragoncon_lj_archive: (Default)
Dragoncon Livejournal Community Archive

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345 678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 20th, 2025 01:38 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios